top of page

Report : Rough.

How Function affects Zoo Enclosure Design

Initial Slide Titles
Subject / Inquiry & The Reason I have chosen this Subject.

Ever since the rise of Modernism, more and more people are being made aware of animal welfare and how Zoos can provide suitable facilities that allow captive animals in live a more fulfilling life. From the exhibits themselves to the holding facilities located back of house, the design has to stem from the keepers and animals in order to be able to cater to the needs of both parties. In particular, what are the physical and behavioural needs of the animals? or where should we locate the holding facility in relationship to the enclosure to ensure the animals are able to travel to and fro without harming the keepers? All of these questions must be answered in order for the design team to be able to design an exhibit that not only provides a natural environment for its residents but double as an efficient workspace for the keepers too. For this reason, I wanted to carefully analyse each element that goes into designing an enclosure that will allow its residents to be able to act like they would in the wild as well as meet the needs of the keepers.

​

I have chosen to delve into Zoo Design and in particular, Enclosure Design as working at Safari World in 2016 have brought to my attention what difference an enclosure designed with the animals in mind can do in allowing efficient running and the overall welfare of the animals. For example, as the tiger enclosure is designed and built cooperatively amongst architects, landscape architects and zoo keepers themselves, the end result is an enclosure that meets the needs of the animals not only physically but psychologically ( i.e the enclosure includes a complex environment filled with stimulants for the animals ) as well as provide an efficient place where the keepers can work efficiently. Therefore, by researching more into the factors that play in designing an enclosure, I hope to be able to take this newly acquired information and implement them in the existing enclosures at my workplace.

  1. State my Subject / Inquiry

    • Zoo Design​

    • How Function affects Zoo Enclosure Design

  2. What has made me want to study further into this subject​

    • Working at Safari World has highlighted how important it is that the enclosure is designed to cater for the needs of the animals as well as allowing the keepers to work efficiently​

  3. Key Text : John Berger’s ‘Ways of Seeing’

  4. Why I have chosen this text

    • His way of uncovering a subject is very thorough and the different aspects in which he looked at in order to land at a conclusion is very inspiring as working with animals is a very complex and detailed matter. Therefore, by using John Berger's process of uncovering a subject, I would be able to land on a strong conclusion as well.​

  5. Key Text : Jack Self’s ‘What You Should Think about Architecture’

  6. Why I have chosen this text

    • As enclosures are essentially house built for animals, I felt that by taking the structure apart and looking at them piece by piece, I will be able to really delve into the individual components that make up a good enclosure ( i.e. holding facilities, the exhibit etc. )​

  7. Initial Structure of Report

  8. How I will further research the Tiger Enclosure

    • Why have I chosen to look at the Tiger Enclosure​

  9. How I will further research the Dolphin Enclosure

    • Why have I chosen to look at the Dolphin Enclosure​

  10. How I will further research the Lion Enclosure​

    • Why have I chosen to look at the Lion Enclosure​

John Berger's Ways of Seeing
Jack Self's What You Should Think about Architecture 

In What you Should Think about Architecture, Jack Self explores what he thinks is the for main criteria in which can be used to determine good architecture. He explores the notions surrounding Aesthetics, Programme, Function and Form and how modern architecture incorporates them in order to build a structure that not only caters for its residents but is pleasing to the eye as well. Aesthetics is the simply, the study of beauty and why we find something beautiful. Aesthetics concerns the ethics of style and how the way in which we doing something is motivated by personal ethics. For example, a “casual style of speech” conveys familiarity and friendliness; but not whether or not the speaker is trying to please the listener. Hence, “style” is just the “how” and never to “why”.

 

The Programme concerns all the actions the architecture has imagined will take place in it. Just like its use in biology and computing, programming in architecture means the causes of a person or animal to behave in a predetermined way. Programming is also where architecture and building can become separated.  For example, when a family approached an architect asking her to design an extension for their home, they were told that they don’t need such thing as it wouldn’t be beneficial for the family in the long run. Furthermore, bedroom, bathroom and living room, even though often mislabelled as the “function”, are all programmes. They describe the intended activities of the space, as well as the furnishing that will further help cater for these activities.

 

The next criteria touched upon Jack Self is Function. Even though function comes from the Latin “fungi” meaning to perform, it would seem more appropriate for describing activity than programme. However, the idea of function as a performed action has long been overtaken by its usage within the modern world. Functionalism is the study of ergonomic actions, involving measuring efficiencies and tolerances. What is important is that function never directly dictate design, but rather sets the conditions and parameters in which the creative limit of the project abide in. For example, in Zoo Design, The Zoo Enclosure Standards published in 2001 will determine the minimum sizes of the enclosures built after that as well as outline any special needs any species have. Last but not least, Form. Form, in architecture is first of all the plan drawing. Form is the “spatial articulation of functions, programme and aesthetic”. It is only about space.

​

I have chosen to use What you Should Think about Architecture as one of main key texts as I feel that Zoo Enclosures even though put its residents as top priority, is still required to be a place where the visitors can enjoy viewing as well. Therefore, by looking at Zoo enclosures and how they incorporate these four criteria, I will be able to pick out the similarities in the various enclosures ( i.e the holding facilities, the exhibit furnishings ) and hence, determine what factors actually determine the designing of the enclosure. Furthermore, enclosures and houses share the same programme- which is to provide a suitable habitat for its inhabitants. Therefore, I felt that it would only be appropriate it I analyse and observe enclosure design the same way I would analyse and observe the design of a house. 

Intent and Initial Structure of Report
Furthering Research at the Tiger Enclosure

In order to properly see the enclosure design in action. I have decided to use the Tiger enclosure as one of the main case studies within my report to furthermore inform my discussion. Tigers are highly intelligent and curious creatures therefore , their enclosure must be designed in order to be able to satisfy their curious minds in order to prevent stereotypic behaviour forming. Stereotypic behaviour is  repetitive, invariant behaviour pattern with no obvious goal or function. This behaviour is not seen in wild animals therefore is caused from lack of stimulants leading to frustration and boredom. One of the ways the enclosure can counteract this problem is by designing less obtrusive structures in the enclosure, allow more vegetation to grow. The vegetation will then attract birds and hence, create a complex environment for the animals similar to its natural counterpart. 

 

As tigers are also quite large animals with the males easily spanning 3 metres, they are able to jump upwards up to 4 metres and are able to leap forwards up to about 6 metres. Therefore, the enclosure must be built not only high enough, but wide enough in order to ensure that the animals will not be able to break loose and possible harm other animals and keepers. For example, prior to entering the tiger enclosures, there are two automatic gates manually controlled by staff. The automatic fence allows the staff to make sure the customer vehicles’ windows are all closed prior to entering the enclosure as well as prevent any deer from the enclosure prior from entering the tiger enclosure. Therefore in this case, the enclosure must be built not only with the animals psychological, physical and behavioural needs in mind. This enclosure also has to be built with ensuring staff safety in mind as well.

​

I will use this enclosure to further research my inquiry buy interviewing the keepers on their relationship with the enclosure's design and how the design of the enclosure has impacted their working whether positively or negatively. Furthermore, by working alongside the keepers, I will be able to observe how the design of the enclosure lends itself to everyday usage.

Above:

These are the first gates the customer will see when entering the tiger enclosure.

​

Below:

This gate is the second and last gate before the tiger enclosure and above the gate is a control room where a member of staff operates.

Furthering Research at the Dolphin Facility

In addition to analysing the tiger enclosures in order to support my argument, I have also decided to analyse the marine department facility. I have decided to analyse the dolphin facility as dolphins have highly contrasting physical and behavioural traits to tigers. Dolphins and whales are highly sociable and curious animals and therefore, their enclosure must be built in order to encourage the keepers to interact with the animals. For example, as The Dolphin Show is part of what the park offers, a close relationship between the trainer and the animal is encouraged. One trainer will be assigned a dolphin each in order to prevent the dolphins from confusing commands. 

 

Since the marine mammals spend all their time under water, they are very susceptible to the water conditions. Unlike their natural counterpart, water in the dolphinarium does not contain plankton, algae or fungi therefore it can’t be able to “self purify”. Due to this inability to “self-purify”, water at the bottom at the pool and near the surface may become places where harmful bacteria can form therefore, water filtration and chemical treatment has to be introduced to prevent this from happening. However, these machines must be geared and set to high levels of precision as too much of one chemical can really harm the residents. For example, too high of a Chlorine count may cause the dolphins' skin to peel and even blindness. In order to prevent this from happening, the team will have to check the valves and filtering system in 4 hour intervals in order to make sure that the chlorine count doesn’t exceed 0.25 ppm. Therefore, due to having to check the valves after work hours, keepers take turn staying over at the facility. For this purpose, the facility has to be designed to not only house the animals, but the keepers as well. Furthermore, in order to reduce travelling time between the keeper’s lodge and the control room, it is important that the two are built close together. Therefore, as supposed to the tiger enclosure where the enclosure design’s priority is to ensure staff safety, the marine department  facility is designed more to ensure the animals’ safety.

​

I will use this enclosure to further support my argument in my report by attaching a GoPro with either myself or one of the trainers when entering the water with the animals in order to study the ways in which the animals interact with the enclosure and from this footage, I will be able to pick out specific components of the enclosure and analyse the way they cater for the needs of the animals as well as the trainers.

​

​

The curved edge of the platform unsures the animals are able to come up to the platform without scratching themselves.

Furthering Research at the Lion Enclosure

I have decided in addition to the two enclosure mentioned prior, to analyse the lion enclosure within my report to furthermore inform my discussion. Lions are highly intelligent and social creatures therefore , their enclosure must be designed in order to be able to satisfy their curious minds in order to prevent stereotypic behaviour forming. Stereotypic behaviour is repetitive, invariant behaviour pattern with no obvious goal or function. This behaviour is not seen in wild animals therefore is caused from lack of stimulants leading to frustration and boredom. However, unlike tigers where one or two may stray from the pack in hopes of finding stimulant , lions tend to stick together more. Therefore, it is vital that the enclosure provides stimulants that can keep the animals mentally as well as physically stimulated to prevent frustration growing and fights breaking within the par. Even though it is not a problem now as the lions are still young, when the males grow up, there will be a need to rule the pride, therefore the enclosure must be designed for when the time comes, it can house different groups of lions as and still be able to satisfy the animals physically and psychologically as well as cater for their needs.

 

Even more so than tigers, lions hold to potential to be of danger to the staff therefore the two enclosures have to be designed where the animals won’t feel too restricted but the staff will not be under any danger when interacting with the animals. However, unlike the large measurements of a tiger, the male lion only grows to about just under 2.5 metres. Therefore, their quite smaller body and absence of curious nature does not require the enclosure to be designed to keep the lions out of other enclosures as much as it does in the tiger enclosures.

​

I will use this enclosure to support my discussion within my report in addition to the tiger enclosure as these two enclosures are adjoined and therefore, hold many similarities. Therefore, I think it may be interesting to see how such similar enclosures cater for the different needs of each species.

Lion Enclosure

  1. State my Subject / Inquiry

    • Zoo Design​

    • How Function affects Zoo Enclosure Design

  2. What has made me want to study further into this subject​

    • Working at Safari World has highlighted how important it is that the enclosure is designed to cater for the needs of the animals as well as allowing the keepers to work efficiently​

  3. Why Zoo Enclosure Design ?

    • My process of how I ended up basing my project on Zoo Enclosure Design

    • How I have landed here from looking at Zoo Design in General​

  4. Key Text : John Berger’s ‘Ways of Seeing’

  5. Why I have chosen this text

    • His way of uncovering a subject is very thorough and the different aspects in which he looked at in order to land at a conclusion is very inspiring as working with animals is a very complex and detailed matter. Therefore, by using John Berger's process of uncovering a subject, I would be able to land on a strong conclusion as well.​

  6. Key Text : Jack Self’s ‘What You Should Think about Architecture’

  7. Why I have chosen this text

    • As enclosures are essentially house built for animals, I felt that by taking the structure apart and looking at them piece by piece, I will be able to really delve into the individual components that make up a good enclosure ( i.e. holding facilities, the exhibit etc. )​

  8. How I will further research the Tiger Enclosure

    • Why have I chosen to look at the Tiger Enclosure​

  9. How I will further research the Dolphin Enclosure

    • Why have I chosen to look at the Dolphin Enclosure​

  10. How I will further research the Lion Enclosure​

    • Why have I chosen to look at the Lion Enclosure​

Slide Titles Revised.

After re-reading the brief as well as discussing with Jordan, I felt as though I may have not discussed around my chosen subject enough in my presentation. Therefore, I have chosen to take out the slide where I talk about my intent concerning the report, which is to take the newly acquired information that I will uncover as a result of researching and apply it to a Tiger Sanctuary back in Thailand, and instead, talk further about how I have ended up deciding to base my report around Zoo Enclosure Design as supposed to Zoo Design in general. I wanted to talk more about how I have ended up basing my report of this subject as I felt that by having a second pair of eyes look at my development, I will be able to look at my process from a different point of view and maybe if there were potential points of interest concerning the subject that I have missed out on, they maybe able to help point that out.

Why Zoo Enclosure Design ?

I started looking at Zoo Design in general because initially, I felt that there were so many more factors that play into how “good” a Zoo Design is. Since the mid-20 century, the environment awareness and human right ethics has become more wildly known, giving way to animal rights as well. In 1950, Hediger wrote “Wild Animals in Captivity” which opened the public’s eyes to the idea of practices and exhibit design based on an animal’s natural history. As well as advances in healthcare, animals in captivity began to be treated for both physical and mental health. Whether it be how much interaction between the animals and the visitors the design allows, to how the design aids efficient back of house is running. These factors all play a crucial part in making up a zoo that not only allows the animals to feel natural in an unnatural environment but provide them with the best quality of life as well.

 

Much like Jack Self in ‘What You Should Think about Architecture’, I felt that Zoo Design was such a large topic that without breaking it down or in my case, narrowing down and specifying my report on one certain section. It would be easy for me to feel overwhelmed by how much information is available and therefore may prevent me from really building as strong foundation to my arguments within my report. As I was so inspired how Jack Self has approached architecture, I felt that it would benefit me if I were to approach Zoo Architecture the same way- by analysing the Aesthetics, Programme, Function and Form. I wanted to start my researching based on these four criteria, as Zoo Design, specifically Zoo Enclosure Design are built to provide space for captive animals to live in, and much like humans, they require architecture that will allow them to behave naturally on a day-to-day basis. For example, a person will normally start their day by washing up, therefore, there must be a toilet located somewhere in the house, the same goes for animals, as tigers are natural born swimmers, it is important that an enclosure offers a pond in order to provide them with an alternative way to exercise. Therefore, I felt that by studying/delving further into the concept of Zoo Enclosure Design, and the factors that affect it, I will be able to really determine the main elements that allow these designs to house such complex creatures. Of course, it is never easy to exactly determine what a felid ( big cat ) requires within its enclosure as research about its behaviour is very limited. Therefore, as well as looking at behavioural studies done, it would be interesting to include case studies within my research, the study of the relationship of the inhabitants and the design of a captive environment.

As I have already chosen to write my report in an extended essay/ dissertation format. I felt that it would be nice to have three main chapters in my report. I wanted to write my report based on the extended essay format as I felt that there were a lot of animal behavioural studies, experiments, theories as well as case studies that go into designing a Zoo. By allowing myself to write in this format, I will be able to produce this report similar to that of an academic paper and hence include only information I deemed necessary in allowing me to reach a strong argument. Therefore, with writing about what affects/determines Zoo Enclosure design in mind, I felt that it would only be appropriate that I write in this format. I have decide to base my chapters on the factors that I felt are crucial in designing an enclosure. Supported by case studies, I will be able to delve into the different ways in which the design provides for its inhabitants as well as how it caters for the keepers.

​

  • Introduction : The History and Future of Zoo Enclosure Design

  • Chapter One : Zoo Enclosure Design; What makes a Good Design ?

    • Aethetics, Programme, Function and Form​

  • Chapter Two : How Zoo Enclosure Design provide for it’s Inhabitants

    • Marine Enclosure​

    • Tiger Enclosure

  • Chapter Three :  How Zoo Enclosure Design Works alongside the Keepers 

    • Marine Enclosure â€‹

    • Tiger Enclosure

  • Conclusion : What really Determines Zoo Enclosure Design 

"A Funny thing happens when you put animals in a natural environment, they act natural." - San Diego Zoo

In Ways Of Seeing, John Berger examines how people has always used imagery as part of their language i.e how me we see things before we can talk about them with words. ‘Seeing comes before words. The child looks and recognises before it can speak’. (J.Berger, 2009. Bookcover) The idea behind this is that the visual world is what creates the world that we describe with words. To illustrate, Berger proceeds to delve deeper into this concept by showing an example of Vincent Van Gogh’s ‘Wheatfield with Crows’. Berger allowed us to examine and come up with what we think Van Gogh may be trying to convey in this painting then proceeded to informs us that it ‘is the last picture that Van Gogh painted before he killed himself.’ (J.Berger, 2009. P.21).  Where at first, all we took from the painting was sun and a farmers harvest, after given such information that grounds the painting and suggests the inspiration for it, we now see something more sinister. What John Berger was trying to achieve by this example was how the context of a painting can ultimately change our view of it.  

 

In addition to suggesting how the context surrounding an image may alter and dictate the way we perceive the image, Berger believes that the way we see things is affected ultimately by our knowledge and beliefs. And because of such knowledge and beliefs, we judge art by our own understanding of concepts like “ beauty, trust, civilisation, form, status” and “taste” ( 2009 P.4 ). To illustrate, Berger then proceeds to show schoolchildren a reproduction of a Caravaggio. The comments were “ I think it could be they stole the food and one of them saying they’re not going to eat it, it’s stolen food.”. This suggests that children connect images no matter what background, directly to with their own experiences. One child even interpreted the subject in the middle of the painting to be Jesus as the man in the painting to him appeared to be “[he’s] in the centre of the table and looks like he might be a leader of some kind.” this comment coupled with the fact that most of the girls suspected the subject to be female and most of the boys suspected the same subject to be male furthermore illustrates that unless told otherwise, children will directly relate any given imagery to their own knowledge and experiences.

 

This is why I have chosen Ways of Seeing as one of my main key texts and have chosen to talk about these two examples because Berger has included within the process of trying the decipher how images are perceived by the viewers. Just like images, zoos and their design are perceived by the public and whether positive or negative, the public will have some sort of opinion on zoos and without the support of the public, zoos won’t be able to survive. For example, unless the member of the public has worked at a zoo before, they may not be able to perceive the zoo the way the zoo has intended to be perceived. Just like in the case of the schoolchildren and the reproduction of Caravaggio, most members of the public will not likely know of the intent or inspiration of the design or any context thats surrounds the design therefore proceeding to perceive said design to their own knowledge and experiences. I am really inspired by the way Berger has explored this concept via surveying and chosen schoolchildren as well as adults. And, by using these methods, pick apart and explore views on zoo design. Therefore, I feel that if I approach my subject similarly to how he approaches his, I would be able to compare the importance of the different elements in Zoo Design from the publics perspective as well as the Zoo’s -as both opinions are of equal importance.

Initial Presentation.

Slide Titles Revised Again.
  1. State my Subject / Inquiry

    • Zoo Design​

    • How Programme affects Zoo Enclosure Design

  2. What has made me change my inquiry to Function as supposed to Programme

    • Talking to the owner of Safari World has revealed certain limitations concerning information that too revealing to public therefore, a limited amount of information surrounding the running of these enclosures may not be sufficient enough in order for me to conduct a strong enough argument​

    • Leading me to focus more on the animals as the different departments located at Safari World all house animals that are very different both behaviourally and physically

  3. Essay Style

    • As the information obtained throughout my research are mostly academic papers done by researchers, it is only appropriate if my report follows a similar template 

  4. Key Text : John Berger’s ‘Ways of Seeing’

    • Why I have chosen this text

      • His way of uncovering a subject is very thorough and the different aspects in which he looked at in order to land at a conclusion is very inspiring as working with animals is a very complex and detailed matter. Therefore, by using John Berger's process of uncovering a subject, I would be able to land on a strong conclusion as well.

  5. Key Text : Jack Self’s ‘What You Should Think about Architecture’

    • Why I have chosen this text

      • As enclosures are essentially house built for animals, I felt that by taking the structure apart and looking at them piece by piece, I will be able to really delve into the individual components that make up a good enclosure ( i.e. holding facilities, the exhibit etc. )​​

  6. Continuation of "Key Text : Jack Self’s ‘What You Should Think about Architecture’"

  7. How I will further research the Tiger Enclosure

    • Why have I chosen to look at the Tiger Enclosure​

  8. How I will further research the Dolphin Enclosure

    • Why have I chosen to look at the Dolphin Enclosure​

  9. How I will further research the Lion Enclosure​

    • Why have I chosen to look at the Lion Enclosure​

  10. Moving on/ Plan of Action​

    • Survey Monkey in both English and Thai​

I have decided to once again revisit my slides as I felt that I wasn't using this opportunity to discuss my ideas to its full potential. Therefore, I have decided to instead of using 2 slides for my key texts, I will only allocate one slide for each of my key texts in order to allow space for me to talk about my chosen essay style and my intentions with the information uncovered through researching. I have also decided to talk more in detail about how I have come to look at how function affects enclosure design when I initially wanted to base my inquiry on the programme. I want to delve into further detail on this process as I feel that there is potential where I have either missed a potentially interesting area of inquiry and by discussing it, another student can pick up on it.

Final Presentation.

  • What is Zoo Design?

    • Contrary to popular belief, Design for zoos include much more than "enclosure design". In addition to animal exhibit spaces, it is vital to consider behind-the-scenes management and support areas, associated public spaces and tactical approaches to story-telling, including high- or low-tech interpretive media.

    • Naturalistic , authentic designs show visitors the importance of habitat and animals and habitat are interdependent

    • Main goal of modern zoos is to promote conservation and educate visitors 

    • With this in mind, I wanted to focus on how the design and allocation of each facility in the zoo in relation to each other can help the keepers run the zoo efficiently whilst still catering for the needs of the visitors.

    • For example, the water condition at marine pavilions are very crucial in maintaining animal welfare and therefore the facility in which houses the filtration systems must be close enough to the keepers lodge that the keepers can access th machines easily and efficiently.

    • However, after talking to the owner of Safari World Thailand, it was brought to my attention that certain limitations concerning information are too revealing to the public therefore, a limited amount of information surrounding the running of these enclosures may not be sufficient enough in order for me to conduct a strong enough argument.

  • Moving over to Function

    • Promoting animal welfare is one of the main goals modern zoological parks must assume as a priority.

    • The design must stem from the animals themselves , as this design is directly affects them, without proper exhibits, holding facilities and appropriate back of house support, the design is not only inadequate but useless. Much like how architect often talk to the client before designing an the client’s house, the zoo designer must take into account what the behavioural and physical needs of the animals are as well as what maintenance requirements are needed to be taken into account. 

    • For example, when housing cetaceans i.e dolphins and whales, there is always a general idea that “bigger is better” however, Atlantic bottlenose dolphins do not like deep waters and are often observed in the wild in waters less than 3 metres deep. Indicating that the dolphins resided in the shallower areas and only moved to deeper waters when food is scarce. Therefore, even though captive Atlantic bottlenose dolphins where provided a total of 5 pools with depts varying between 3.96 m to 8.23 m, the dolphins were observed to spend time in the moderately sized pools most, then smaller pools then the largest pool least.The dolphins did not choose pools in proportion to any of these dimensions i.e larger pool dimensions paralleling greater use, nor did the dolphins behave in a way that indicated no preferences between depths and locations. Instead, the dolphins had preferences. These preferences were not correlated with increasing sizes or proportions but on the dimension of overall depth.

    • If animal needs not met :

      • Stereotypic behaviour, a pattern of movement such as pacing and head bobbing that is performed repeatedly, relatively irrelevant in form and has no apparent function or goal are really seen performed by wild animals therefore re often considered an indication of stress. These behaviours are often a result of an accumulation of causes for example, these behaviours may arise when an animal is physically restrained from moving to a desired place. Stereotypies may also stem from other behavioural or psychological stresses such as boredom, physical restraint, fear or frustration.

      • Unsuccessful reintroduction to the wild due to loss of natural behaviour crucial to surviving in the wild. Animals in zoos with lack of stimulants that encourage and allow natural behaviours such as foraging and hunting are 4 times more likely to die from starvation aften being released into the wild than any other location

  • Essay Style - Extended essay

    • Takes a theoretical or historical topic that addresses an aspect of visual culture and uses a writing style similar to that of an academic paper. Topics could involve areas such as: fine art and post- colonial theory; contemporary film and narrative; or fashion and identity. Your research would usually be based around reading and understanding secondary and primary texts on your subject and, where appropriate, visual analysis. 

    • As the information obtained throughout my research are mostly academic papers done by researchers, it is only appropriate if my report follows a similar template

    • Research papers such as 'Effects of Pool Size on Free-Choice Selections by Atlantic Bottlenose Dolphins' by Melissa R.Shayan, 'Containment Facilities Standard for Zoos' publish in New Zealand in 2007 and 'The Maintenance of Satisfactory Water Conditions in Dolphinaria' by Corporate Public Health Engineer to name a few.

  • John Berger’s Ways of Seeing

    • Examines how people has always used imagery as part of their language i.e how me we see things before we can talk about them with words. ‘Seeing comes before words. The child looks and recognises before it can speak’.

    • The idea behind this is that the visual world is what creates the world that we describe with words. 

    • An example of Vincent Van Gogh’s ‘Wheatfield with Crows’. Berger allowed us to examine and come up with what we think Van Gogh may be trying to convey in this painting then proceeded to informs us that it ‘is the last picture that Van Gogh painted before he killed himself.’ Where at first, all we took from the painting was sun and a farmers harvest, after given such information that grounds the painting and suggests the inspiration for it, we now see something more sinister. What John Berger was trying to achieve by this example was how the context of a painting can ultimately change our view of it. 

    • In addition to suggesting how the context surrounding an image may alter and dictate the way we perceive the image, Berger believes that the way we see things is affected ultimately by our knowledge and beliefs. And because of such knowledge and beliefs, we judge art by our own understanding of concepts like “ beauty, trust, civilisation, form, status” and “taste” ( 2009 P.4 ). 

    • Berger then proceeds to show schoolchildren a reproduction of a Caravaggio. The comments were “ I think it could be they stole the food and one of them saying they’re not going to eat it, it’s stolen food.”. This suggests that children connect images no matter what background, directly to with their own experiences. One child even interpreted the subject in the middle of the painting to be Jesus as the man in the painting to him appeared to be “[he’s] in the centre of the table and looks like he might be a leader of some kind.” this comment coupled with the fact that most of the girls suspected the subject to be female and most of the boys suspected the same subject to be male furthermore illustrates that unless told otherwise, children will directly relate any given imagery to their own knowledge and experiences.

    • This is why I have chosen Ways of Seeing as one of my main key texts and have chosen to talk about these two examples because Berger has included within the process of trying the decipher how images are perceived by the viewers. Just like images, zoos and their design are perceived by the public and whether positive or negative, the public will have some sort of opinion on zoos and without the support of the public, zoos won’t be able to survive. For example, unless the member of the public has worked at a zoo before, they may not be able to perceive the zoo the way the zoo has intended to be perceived. Just like in the case of the schoolchildren and the reproduction of Caravaggio, most members of the public will not likely know of the intent or inspiration of the design or any context thats surrounds the design therefore proceeding to perceive said design to their own knowledge and experiences. I am really inspired by the way Berger has explored this concept via surveying and chosen schoolchildren as well as adults. And, by using these methods, pick apart and explore views on zoo design. Therefore, I feel that if I approach my subject similarly to how he approaches his, I would be able to compare the importance of the different elements in Zoo Design from the publics perspective as well as the Zoo’s -as both opinions are of equal importance.

  • Jack Self’s “What you should think about architecture”

    • Aesthetics simply, is the study of beauty. Specifically the reason to why we find something beautiful and the philosophy of whether beauty exists objectively. This makes it very similar to ethics , where both fields work hard to understand how humans decided whether or not the object in which they are observing falls into which category. Both of them concern value judgements and moral priorities and therefore unlike logic and some philosophies, aesthetics in not based on rules. Aesthetics and ethics are rather about balancing subjective and objective inputs in which results in a common personal decision. 

      • Elephant house, Zurich Zoo = Roof inspired by the light filtering through tree branches â€‹

    • Programme within architecture is all the imagined activities that take place within a building. The word despite being used in this context, still remains the same definition as if it were to be used in biology or computing meaning the causes for a person or animal to behave in a predetermined way. Although programming when used in this context may sound sinister, the way in which some animals in nature behave the way they do is conceptually identical to descriptions of how humans organise their spaces and the movement within them. Like how we can dictate the operations of a computer, we can predetermine the possible behaviour of the population through designation and affordances of space.

      • Giraffe House, Auckland Zoo = Slope in building follows natural built of animal and the 3 m high side of the building allows the keepers to safely observe the animals​

    • Similarly to Programme, Functionalism is the study of ergonomic actions, involving measuring efficiencies and tolerances. Today, when we look at a building’s function we must take into account all the invisible parameters that cause it to exist not only just the concerning its occupancy. Finance, planning, regulations, standards and environmental factors are all functional parameters that influence programme and form.

      • Lion George, Melbourne Zoo = Prior to constructing the enclosure, an animal behaviourist is called in to calculate the requirements of the glass in order to be able to withstand a lion running at it at full speed​

    • When considering form, architectures have to take into account the difference between an infill building that fits tightly within its' site boundaries (leaving no unoccupied space on the site, except perhaps a defined outdoor courtyard) and a freestanding building located within a large expanse of parking. Without the aid of other space-defining forms such as trees, fences, level changes, and so forth, it is very difficult for a large space to be defined or satisfactorily articulated by most singular forms. Some aspects that are usually taken into account when designing are the shape, mass, scale and proportion of the whole building.

      • Wildlife Observation, Bern Zoo = Built of building combined with its finish make sure minimal disturbance to wild animals​

  • Tiger Department

    • Bengal Tiger ( max. 3.3 m ) + Siberian Tiger ( max. 3.7 m )​

    • Jumps upwards of up to 4 m and leaps forwards of up to 6 m

    • Curious creatures and therefore if not satisfies with enrichment and the hunting motivation still remains after feeding. All the pent up frustration may lead to the development of stereotypic behaviour such as pacing.

    • Safety is very important when dealing with carnivores

    • For example, the double metal gates located before entering the tiger enclosures ensure no tiger is able to escape as well as keep other safari animals away from the tigers. The staff on the tower above the gate is also able to monitor the amount of cars entering the enclosure as well as their speeds. In case of emergencies like tigers escaping, the metal fences are closed in between enclosures to prevent the animal from entering another enclosure and coming face to face with lions.

    • Plan of action:

      • GoPro : follow routine, mount GoPro on head of staff to record both staff and animal interaction to the enclosure design and/or furnishing​

      • Talk to ranger and keepers in importance of facility location i.e keeper office located behind Zone 2 ensures easy access and minimal disturbance to customers

  • Dolphin Department â€‹

    • Chosen due to difference in both behavioural and physical needs of animals in contrast to the tigers â€‹

    • Due to the animals house being cetaceans, the animals spend most of their time under water therefore are very sensitive to any changes in water therefore apart from the regular water filtering, chemical treatment of the water is also used.

    • Too high chlorine levels cause skin peeling, too low doesn't efficiently clean the pool.

    • Chlorine levels checked every 4 hours to ensure the level doesn't exceed 0.3ppm as recommended by the Florida Department of Resources as stated in the 'The Maintenance of Satisfactory Water Conditions in Dolphinaria' by Corporate Public Health Engineer

    • Plan of action:

      • GoPro : follow routine from morning to evening, during show (?), during training and routine cleaning in order to get a better view of the part of the facility that is submerged under water​

      • Learn more about the behaviour of these animals and how certain routines are carried out

      • Talk to colleague that helped design the facility about how he has come to a conclusion such as this and the pros and cons

  • Lion Department​

    • African Lions ( max 2.5 m )​

    • ' Preliminary Evaluation of Environmental Enrichment Techniques for African Lions' by D.M.Powell

    • Plan of action:

      • Same as tiger department with addition of obseriving animal behaviour​

  • Moving Forward​

    • Find any study papers done by Thai professors â€‹

    • Survey Monkey in both English and Thai on Enclosure size Preference vs. Visuality of Animals as well as the Aesthetics v.s. Naturalistic

    • Analyse more study papers on Lions and Dolphins

Moving Forward.

Moving forward, I think I might have enough research concerning the reasons behind the design aspect of zoo enclosures however, not enough on the design alone therefore, from this point forward, when analysing further enclosures, I would focus more on the design aspect of the enclosures. For example, the pros and cons of each enclosure design and detailed case studies on the designs that worked and the others that don’t. Furthermore, I think that it would be helpful in grounding me and making sure I stay focused on the design aspect of the enclosures if I were to keep Jack Self’s four criteria as well as John Berger’s ideas in the foreground and when building up argument in the future.

 

It would also be interesting for me to interview Jack Self as Peter felt that Jack Self would be interested that I have decided to look at Zoo Architecture Design through his lenses and by interviewing him, I would be able to acquire his ideology, his views on current enclosure designs as well as what he thinks makes up a good enclosure. Furthermore, as one of Jack Self’s criteria concerns space and how space in and around the architecture were to be taken into account when designing a built, reading “Poets of Space” by Gaston Bachelard may also help me understand even further the importance of space and how the use of it can make or break a design. In the same way, as I have already read and analyse John Berger’s “Why Look at Animals?’ prior, it would be very interesting to analyse a contrasting opinion on Zoos by reading “In Praise of the Zoo” by Alain De Botton. 

Feedback.

After presenting, I had the chance to listen to my group’s views on my chosen subject. Even though I was really nervous a failed to touch upon a lot of things I wanted to mention due to having too much information for 10 slides, I was still glad about being able to talk about the subject to a group of people who had in some way a similar field of interest. What stood out most to one of my group members were my point on how the Giraffe House in Aukland was built following and inspired by the natural slope of the animal. It was a perfect example of how “form follows function”.  Another group member also said that it could be potentially interesting for me to highlight on the views the public have on animal welfare and elaborate on the juxtaposition about people also existing in the enclosure alongside the animals , even if it was just for a short amount of time and how the design has to also cater for its visitors as well as its residents.

 

Similarly, Catrin also liked the idea of how architecture design in zoos work almost in a paradoxical way in how houses usually symbolise privacy and safety and therefore, not often design to be looked in to; however, in zoos, buildings are designed specifically to looked in to. For example, the Lubetkin Penguin Pool at London Zoo, even though does not provide anywhere near an appropriate environment for its penguins, provide a perfect viewing platform where its visitors can observe the animals. Therefore, Catrin suggested looking places where the architecture works and where the architecture doesn’t ( i.e the Atlantic Bottlenose Dolphin pool) and how the design can look aesthetically pleasing to the visitors as still be able to serve as a useful environment to its inhabitants.

 

Furthermore, like Catrin, Peter really liked the idea of using the 4 criteria set by Jack Self alongside John Berger in looking at Zoo architecture and referring back to the Lubetkin Penguin Pool, he suggested that it would be interesting to see how the context in this case tallies up against the ideology or the commissioning process as well as the inspiration behind such a forward build. However, what has been brought to my attention is that even though I have read a lot of information and they felt that I knew a lot in terms of the animal welfare and requirement, it still need to make sure that I focus on the design and aesthetic portion of Zoo architecture. Furthermore, with how well Jack Self’s criteria seem to ground John Berger’s “Ways of Seeing”, Peter said that it would be really beneficial and would really help me keep my focus on design by keeping the criteria in the foreground and quote from them in the process of building up my argument and if possible, interview Jack Self. Peter as well as Catrin has also recommended me Poets of Space by Gaston Bachelard, In Praise of the Zoo by Alain De Botton (as it would be interesting to analyse an opposing view of Zoos in comparison to John Berger’s negative “Why look at Animals?”), and The Object Stares Back by James Elkins.

Notes / What I plan to cover.

© 2023 by ShureArchitects. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page